Riluzole increases glutamate uptake by cultured C6 astroglial cells.

Riluzole is a drug approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and may be effective for the treatment of other neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders. Riluzole exerts diverse actions on the central nervous system, including altering glutamate release and uptake, and therefore act diminishing glutamate extracellular levels, but the underlying mechanism of these actions is still unknown. Here, we demonstrate that riluzole stimulated glutamate uptake and augmented the expression of the glutamate EAAC1 transporter in C6 astroglial cell cultures. The effect of riluzole on glutamate uptake was reduced to below controls when it was co-administered with inhibitors of protein kinase C (PKC; bisindolylmaleimide II), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K; wortmannin) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1; PD173074). Riluzole also decreased reactive oxygen species load with no effect on glutathione levels. This study investigates three independent intracellular pathways and the mechanism of action of riluzole on glutamate metabolism.

Caffeine and adenosine A(2a) receptor antagonists prevent beta-amyloid (25-35)-induced cognitive deficits in mice.

Consumption of caffeine, an adenosine receptor antagonist, was found to be inversely associated with the incidence of Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, caffeine protects cultured neurons against beta-amyloid-induced toxicity, an effect mimicked by adenosine A(2A) but not A(1) receptor antagonists. We now tested if caffeine administration would prevent beta-amyloid-induced cognitive impairment in mice and if this was mimicked by A(2A) receptor blockade. One week after icv administration of the 25-35 fragment of beta-amyloid (Abeta, 3 nmol), mice displayed impaired performance in both inhibitory avoidance and spontaneous alternation tests. Prolonged treatment with caffeine (1 mg/ml) had no effect alone but prevented the Abeta-induced cognitive impairment in both tasks when associated with acute caffeine (30 mg/kg) 30 min treatment before Abeta administration. The same protective effect was observed after subchronic (4 days) treatment with daily injections of either caffeine (30 mg/kg) or the selective adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist SCH58261 (0.5 mg/kg). This provides the first direct in vivo evidence that caffeine and A(2A) receptor antagonists afford a protection against Abeta-induced amnesia, which prompts their interest for managing Alzheimer's disease.

Involvement of adenosine in the neurobiology of schizophrenia and its therapeutic implications.

Based on the neuromodulatory and homeostatic actions of adenosine, adenosine dysfunction may contribute to the neurobiological and clinical features of schizophrenia. The present model of adenosine dysfunction in schizophrenia takes into consideration the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses, since adenosine exerts neuromodulatory roles on these systems, and proposes that adenosine plays a role in the inhibitory deficit found in schizophrenia. Given the role of adenosine activation of adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) in mediating neurotoxicity in early stages of brain development, pre- and peri-natal complications leading to excessive adenosine release could induce primary brain changes (i.e., first hit). These events would lead to an adenosine inhibitory deficit through a partial loss of A1R that may emerge as reduced control of dopamine activity and increased vulnerability to excitotoxic glutamate action in the mature brain (i.e., second hit). Adenosine dysfunction is reasonably compatible with symptoms, gray and white matter abnormalities, progressive brain loss, pre- and peri-natal risk factors, age of onset, response to current treatments, impaired sensory gating and increased smoking in schizophrenia. Pharmacological treatments enhancing adenosine activity could be effective for symptom control and for alleviating deterioration in the course of the illness. Accordingly, allopurinol, which may indirectly increase adenosine, has been effective and well tolerated in the treatment of schizophrenia. Since much of the evidence for the adenosine hypothesis is preliminary and theoretical, further investigation in the field is warranted.

Cinnarizine has an atypical antipsychotic profile in animal models of psychosis.

Cinnarizine, a drug known as a calcium channel blocker, is currently used for the treatment of migraine and vertigo. Induction of extrapyramidal signs by cinnarizine has been reported in the elderly, which is related to its moderate antagonistic properties at dopamine D2 receptors, resembling the mechanism of action of most antipsychotic drugs. Despite this effect, cinnarizine has never been tested as a putative antipsychotic drug. Here we evaluate the potential effect of cinnarizine in two pharmacological models of psychosis, namely amphetamine- and MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion, as well as its ability to induce catalepsy. Cinnarizine significantly counteracted MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg) and amphetamine (5mg/kg) locomotor effects at doses as low as 20mg/kg, having no incremental effect at 60 or 180 mg/kg. Regarding side-effects, cinnarizine induced no catalepsy in mice at the effective dose of 20 mg/kg, inducing only mild catalepsy at the doses of 60 and 180 mg/kg. Based on these results and on the antagonist effect of cinnarizine on dopamine D2 receptors, we suggest that it has a potential antipsychotic effect with an atypical profile that should be evaluated clinically.

Behavioral and cognitive profile of mice with high and low exploratory phenotypes.

Temperament is the heritable and relatively stable pattern of basic emotions, such as fear and anger. We explored behavioral features in mice to select distinct phenotypes with extremes of temperament. In a new environment (open-field) with a central object, two groups of 15 mice from 79 screened were separated according to high or low exploration of the object to compose the high and low exploratory groups, respectively. Their performance was mostly identical in the same task 1 week later and still distinguishable 8 months later, suggesting the presence of trait or temperamental features. These mice were further tested in other behavioral tasks. Compared to low exploratory mice, high exploratory mice were less anxious in the light/dark task and the elevated plus maze, showed increased locomotion in an open-field, improved their performance along trials in the Lashley maze (with appetitive stimulus) and had higher latency to step-down in the inhibitory avoidance task (with aversive stimulus). High exploratory mice were aggressive in the intruder test, whereas low exploratory mice were non-aggressive or submissive. These results show that individual differences in temperament influence a range of behaviors in mice. The behavioral profile of low and high exploratory mice resembled the depressive and hyperthymic temperaments of patients with unipolar depression and bipolar disorders, respectively, which may be relevant for modeling mood disorders.

Atypical antipsychotic profile of flunarizine in animal models.

RATIONALE: Flunarizine is known as a calcium channel blocker commonly used in many countries to treat migraine and vertigo. Parkinsonism has been described as one of its side-effects in the elderly, which is in agreement with its recently characterized moderate D2 receptor antagonism. OBJECTIVES: To perform a pre-clinical evaluation of flunarizine as a potential antipsychotic. METHODS: We evaluated the action of orally administered flunarizine in mice against hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine and dizocilpine (MK-801) as pharmacological models of schizophrenia, induction of catalepsy as a measure for extrapyramidal symptoms and impairment induced by dizocilpine on the delayed alternation task for working memory. RESULTS: Flunarizine robustly inhibited hyperlocomotion induced by both amphetamine and dizocilpine at doses that do not reduce spontaneous locomotion (3-30 mg/kg). Mild catalepsy was observed at 30 mg/kg, being more pronounced at 50 mg/kg and 100 mg/kg. Flunarizine (30 mg/kg) improved dizocilpine-induced impairment on the delayed alternation test. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a profile comparable to atypical antipsychotics. The low cost, good tolerability and long half-life (over 2 weeks) of flunarizine are possible advantages for its use as an atypical antipsychotic. These results warrant clinical trials with flunarizine for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Guanosine selectively inhibits locomotor stimulation induced by the NMDA antagonist dizocilpine.

Guanosine has been shown to modulate glutamate system by stimulating astrocytic glutamate uptake. Recent evidence suggest that the locomotor effects of NMDA receptor antagonists, an animal model of schizophrenia, is associated with activation of non-NMDA glutamatergic receptors caused by increased glutamate release. The present work was undertaken to evaluate whether guanosine could have influence on the hyperlocomotion induced in mice by dizocilpine (MK-801), a NMDA antagonist. We also evaluated the effect of guanosine on the hyperlocomotion induced by the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine, and by the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine. Guanosine (7.5 mg/kg) produced an attenuation of about 60% on the hyperlocomotion induced by dizocilpine (0.25 mg/kg), whereas it did not affect the hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine (5 mg/kg) or caffeine (30 mg/kg). Guanosine pre-treatment did not affect total spontaneous locomotion in all experiments. To test neuronal pathway selectivity, we evaluated MK-801 against guanosine in a working memory paradigm (spontaneous alternation task). Guanosine did not reverted the impairment caused by MK-801 in the spontaneous alternation test, and when administered alone also presented an amnesic effect. The results are discussed based on the current hypothesis of locomotor activation induced by the psychoactive drugs studied. Further studies are necessary to evaluate if guanosine could have clinical utility for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Beta-amyloid treatment sensitizes mice to amphetamine-induced locomotion but reduces response to caffeine.

BACKGROUND: Psychosis frequently occurs in Alzheimer's disease (AD), being associated with more severe cognitive decline, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of centrally administered beta-amyloid peptide, a model for AD, in the locomotor response to amphetamine, caffeine and MK-801, which are psychoactive drugs related to neurochemical changes occurring in psychosis. METHODS: Mice were intracerebroventricularly injected with beta-amyloid (25-35), and after 1 week they were tested in the passive avoidance, spontaneous alternation and locomotor tasks. RESULTS: Besides impaired performance in inhibitory avoidance and spontaneous alternation tasks, beta-amyloid-treated mice showed increased spontaneous locomotion, augmented response to amphetamine (1.5 mg/kg), blunted response to caffeine (30 mg/kg) and no difference in MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg)-induced locomotor activation when compared to its respective control. CONCLUSION: These results are compatible with the hypothesis that beta-amyloid peptide may predispose to psychotic symptoms of AD by increasing sensitivity of the dopaminergic system, possibly related to a decreased adenosinergic inhibitory tone.

Effect of riluzole on MK-801 and amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion.

N-methyl-D aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, such as MK-801, and the dopamine indirect agonist amphetamine are pharmacological models used for the evaluation of putative new treatments for schizophrenia. Since the psychotomimetic effects of NMDA antagonists have recently been linked to their ability to increase glutamate release and since the glutamate release inhibitor riluzole prevented NMDA antagonist neurotoxicity, we evaluated the effect of riluzole on hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg) and amphetamine (2.5 mg/kg). Mice pretreated with riluzole (3 mg/kg) did not influence baseline or MK-801-induced behavior, but 10 mg/kg produced moderate hypolocomotion alone and somewhat prolonged MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion. Pretreatment with riluzole 10 mg/kg, but not 3 mg/kg, had a moderately depressant effect both on spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotion. Taken together, these results suggest that riluzole would not be particularly effective as a treatment for schizophrenia and the neurotoxic and behavioral effect of NMDA antagonists do not clearly correlate.

Neuroprotection by caffeine and adenosine A2A receptor blockade of beta-amyloid neurotoxicity.

Adenosine is a neuromodulator in the nervous system and it has recently been observed that pharmacological blockade or gene disruption of adenosine A(2A) receptors confers neuroprotection under different neurotoxic situations in the brain. We now observed that coapplication of either caffeine (1-25 micro M) or the selective A(2A) receptor antagonist, 4-(2-[7-amino-2(2-furyl)(1,2,4)triazolo (2,3-a)(1,3,5)triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385, 50 nM), but not the A receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (200 nM), prevented the neuronal cell death caused by exposure of rat cultured cerebellar granule neurons to fragment 25-35 of beta-amyloid protein (25 micro M for 48 h), that by itself caused a near three-fold increase of propidium iodide-labeled cells. This constitutes the first in vitro evidence to suggest that adenosine A(2A) receptors may be the molecular target responsible for the observed beneficial effects of caffeine consumption in the development of Alzheimer's disease.

Chronic treatment with caffeine blunts the hyperlocomotor but not cognitive effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK-801 in mice.

RATIONALE: Administration of N-methyl- d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists produce hyperlocomotion and cognitive deficits in rodents. Activation of NMDA receptors promotes adenosine release, and adenosine agonists prevent central effects of NMDA receptor antagonists. We hypothesized that if NMDA receptor antagonists require adenosine to produce behavioral effects, mice tolerant to the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine would have a diminished response to NMDA receptor antagonists. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion and cognitive deficits after chronic caffeine treatment in mice. METHODS: Locomotor activity was analyzed in a computerized system, spontaneous alternation was assessed in the Y-maze and long-term memory was assessed with the inhibitory avoidance task in mice. RESULTS: Mice chronically treated with caffeine in drinking solution (1 mg/ml for 7 days) presented normal habituation and substantial tolerance to acute caffeine (30 mg/kg, i.p.) locomotor effects. MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg, i.p.) produced pronounced hyperlocomotion in water-treated mice, but this effect was abolished in caffeine-drinking mice. Chronic caffeine treatment had no influence on either normal or MK-801-induced deficits in spontaneous alternation and inhibitory avoidance tasks. CONCLUSION: Hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801 may be mediated by reduced adenosinergic activity. These results also suggest that locomotor and cognitive effects of MK-801 can be dissociated and are distinctly modulated. Finally, these findings agree with the adenosine hypofunction model of schizophrenia, since NMDA receptor antagonists are a pharmacological model for this disorder.

Decreased hyperlocomotion induced by MK-801, but not amphetamine and caffeine in mice lacking cellular prion protein (PrP(C)).

The cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) has been involved in several neurodegenerative disorders however it has been proposed that it is also be implicated in psychotic disorders. We investigated the effect of three psychotropic drugs in locomotor activity of PrP(C) knockout (Prnp(O/O)) and wild-type mice. The NMDA receptor channel blocker MK-801 (0.25 mg/kg), the indirect dopamine agonist amphetamine (1 mg/kg) and the adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine (10 mg/kg) were administered i.p. after 60 min of habituation and locomotion was monitored for 3 h. Prnp(O/O) mice presented a diminished hyperlocomotor response to MK-801 treatment but normal response to amphetamine and caffeine compared to wild type mice. These results suggest that lack of PrP(C) leads to a functional alteration in the glutamatergic system, whereas the regulation of both dopaminergic and adenosinergic systems are preserved. Finally, lack of PrP(C) seems not to exacerbate the response to these psychotropic drugs, which modulate neurotransmitter systems possibly involved in schizophrenia and psychotic disorders.